68 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
tags: formulas, HVAC, tech-tip
|
||
---
|
||
# Calculate SEER Degradation by Age
|
||
|
||
This is a quick tech-tip to learn how to calculate the degradation of SEER based
|
||
on age.
|
||
|
||
The degradation of SEER is due to fouling of the evaporator coil with dirt and
|
||
refrigerant charge losses. It should be noted that this is not true for all
|
||
applications, but is used as an estimation based on research done by the `DOE`
|
||
of the average degradation based on systems tested.
|
||
|
||
## Formula
|
||
|
||
This is the formula used to calculate the SEER based on age of the evaporator
|
||
coil / air handler.
|
||
|
||
$$ SEER_d = SEER_n \times (1 - M)^{age} $$
|
||
|
||
| Where | |
|
||
| -------- | ------------------------------------------ | --- |
|
||
| $SEER_d$ | Degradated SEER rating |
|
||
| $SEER_n$ | Nominal SEER rating when equipment was new | |
|
||
| M | Maintenance factor, 0.01-0.03 |
|
||
| age | The age of the equipment, in years |
|
||
|
||
The maintenance factor of 0.01 is for expertly maintained equipment and 0.03 is
|
||
for unmaintained. The maintenance factor in essence is based on 1%-3%
|
||
degradation per year, however there are some
|
||
[studies](https://publications.energyresearch.ucf.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/FSEC-PF-474-18.pdf)
|
||
that show that this can actually be as high as 5% or above depending on climate.
|
||
We could use up to 0.05 as the maintenance factor, just to see what the "range"
|
||
of degradation would be.
|
||
|
||
Interestingly, the study linked also shows that the degradation is higher the
|
||
higher the tonnage of the equipment. It also shows that the degradation is lower
|
||
per year the higher the nominal SEER rating of the system (which is corelated to
|
||
using TXV's and lower airflow rates because of the equipment having multiple
|
||
stages).
|
||
|
||
## Example
|
||
|
||
Let's consider that we have a 13 SEER piece of equipment that was matched when
|
||
installed and the system is 15 years old.
|
||
|
||
Plugging those numbers into our formula.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### Lowest Range (1% degradation / year)
|
||
|
||
$$ SEER_d = 13 \times (1 - 0.01)^{15} = 11.2 $$
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
#### Highest Rage (5% degradation / year)
|
||
|
||
$$ SEER_d = 13 \times (1 - 0.05)^{15} = 6 $$
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
An expertly maintained system may not have degraded that much, with an 11.2 SEER
|
||
vs. a poorly maintained / dirty system that also suffers from refrigerant charge
|
||
losses can be as low as 6 SEER.
|
||
|
||
Thanks for learning how to estimate SEER degradation based on equipment age!
|